Mumbai Slum Evictions - Public Hearings
Sadly, forced slum evictions are common and prevalent across various parts of the world. Mainly in developing countries from Zimbawawe, Kenya, Bangladesh to India and many other places. Recently UN-HABITAT came out with a report sharply criticizing the slum evictions in Zimbawabe where 700,000 people were evicted. Between Nov 2004 to Feburary 2005 the
Indian People's Tribunal(IPT) constituting retired judges, lawyers and other imminent people involved in humanitarian work investigated the legality of demoliations and alternatives through public hearings and research. In their report they have criticized the government and presented various shocking facts not known through the mainstream media previously.
Extent of Evictions:
According to the report within the first 18 days of the evictions, over 39,000 homes were demolished. Among the first was a large settlement with over 6,200 homes in Ambujawadi in Malad, a North West Suburb of Mumbai. An estimated 90,000 homes were demolished in 44 areas. The report lists the areas which were demolished. According to the list, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation seems to indicate that 288.80 acres of land
Excerpts from Public Hearings:
Anita Shukla from Hari Omnagar, MIDC, Andheri
“We have also voted twice for MP and MLA. But there is no count of demolition on our houses; it
Unknown security persons and goons keep haunting us, women are especially troubled
Uma Shankar Jai Narayan Mishra from Hari Omnagar Seva Sangh, Hari Omnagar.
“We paid Rs. 20,000 to a goon for 10 x 20ft home in Hari Omnagar. We did not have any amenities, no water, no electricity the women used to get water for us.”
Rajnath Prasad,
"When we came to
Deposition of Mr. Khairnar, Former Deputy Commissioner - Demolitions, BMC
“In 1976, Kunte- a minister in government- decided to visit slums built till then and authorize it. All slums were given number and authorized. It was also decided that if a single house comes up in slums after that, then the related
Slum construction continued. But no action was ever taken against any failing officers. People enjoy the
Later on, by 2000 a decision was taken to authorize houses built till 1995. Before that, the houses were authorized by giving numbers. Now in this election Congress promised to authorize the houses built till
Due to problems at our native place, we reach Mumbai. Our life does improve. It is shameful for all that
“In 1989, I conducted a survey about the development of slums. I found it is done in a very systematic way. If someone wants to get a house built, he gets it done through someone. If someone wants a slum of 100 houses, with one room of 10 x 15, then they might approach a slum lord.
The ward office staff knew about all development in their ward. During my tenure in Kurla, the MLA, the Deputy Commissioner, the ward officer, junior engineer – all were paid money.”
“Now your houses develop for 7-8 years. You invest more than Rs 50,000 over the years. Thus, the BMC has devastated more than Rs 300 Crores by demolition drive. Many such demolitions have taken place. The ministers come and go. New slums keep coming up.”
Common Themes in the depositions:
- Demolitions take place regularly. There have been several demolitions after 1978. Several people's houses have been demolished more than 5-6 times. Just imagine the pain?
- Many houses were demolished even though they were built before 1995, which according to the government are legal houses. Many people have documentation (ration cards, Vote ID cards) to prove their length of stay.
- People have invested a lot of money (from their standards) in these houses. These were places which were not livable (marshes, wet land) before. They have made it better using their own money. The investments range from 20,000 to 1 lakh.
- Politicians have made several promises in regard to slum housing to them, but none delivered. The current government made an election promise that slums built before 2000 would be legalized. But it later demolished those and did a U turn on the promise.
- Huge amounts of money is spent in bribing the police, goons, corporators. This ranges anywhere between 5 – 50K.
- No Notices were given before the demolitions. India, as a signatory to UN Human Rights treaty is bound to follow certain procedure before any evictions. These were not followed.
In the next blog I will look into more issues raised in the report and dwell more into housing policy issues.
4 Comments:
In the second paragraph it says "constituting retired judges, lawyers and other imminent people involved in humanitarian work" - it should be 'eminent' people. Eminent means well known, reputed,distinguished whereas imminent means about to happen, impending.
sanika sathe
The slum policies in Mumbai only benefit the politicians, illegal builders, goons etc etc. Honest citizens keep paying their taxes (after buying houses for exhorbitant prices and taxes thereon), and always bear the punishments, while the dis-honest ones get houses illegaly almost free of cost through encroachments etc, and paying bribes.
The slum rehabilitation policies are all bound to be misused with several holes in it. Encroachers obtain free housing, which they sell out/lease out, and create another slum through encroachments. This is how the land and housing prices keep moving up, and availability going down.
I am one of the poor persons who are fighting for theirs rights against a rich builder who buys everyone who comes across. I am Speaking about a SRA project which is located in Khandwala compound, Vakola.
What we are fighting for is just the basic amenities like Better sanitation and hygeine which is overlooked by the entire SRA Authorities.When the project started a lot of promises were comitted by the Builder M/s. Vilayatiram Mittal none of which has still been fulfilled. One who spoke against it was tortured or harrassed by the SRA Authorites. It seems the entire goverment is working for him as no one seems to listen to our plea.
Finally we managed to enter the Highcourt Bombay for justice. Everything was going properly and the decision was bound to be on our favour as what we asking was fair enough. But somehow he managed to manipulate our Advocate who inturn didn't show up for the court hearings. As a result our case was given ex party benfit (decision was made in favour of Builder). what we need now is a good lawyer who has some human values who can save our lives from getting destroyed by this builder.
If any one can help us please wite to :-virendrashirodkar2004@yahoo.com
Dear Virendra,
I know a group of advocates specialized in these type (SRA/Property) of matters.
You can contact them. They will surely help you out.
His name is Omar Khayyam 9820764285
-- Aamir
Post a Comment
<< Home